How to pare gender gap

The World Economic Forum (best known for organizing the annual Davos shindig) just published its annual Gender Gap report. It makes for thoroughly depressing reading. On current trends, it will take 118 years before women’s salaries equal those of men; women currently earn what men took home a decade ago.

So here’s a modest proposal to accelerate progress. Talk to any executive at any large organization about gender equality and at some point they’ll give the same reason/make the same excuse (take your pick) for the disparities between how men and women are treated in the workplace: pregnancy.

So maybe it’s time to impose mandatory male parental leave to de-stigmatize pregnancy breaks to help crack the glass ceiling.

The WEF study measures national gender gaps on economic criteria (workforce participation, remuneration and opportunity), political empowerment (ratio of men to women in senior government positions), education (literacy rates and schooling levels), and health and survival (life expectancy and sex ratios at birth). It’s designed to be independent of how developed a country is.

- Advertisement -

The top five countries by ranking are Iceland (No. 1 for a seventh consecutive year), Norway, Finland, Sweden and Ireland. The U.S. dropped 8 places to 28th, as the percentage of women holding government ministerial positions declined to 26 percent from 32 percent; Yemen is the least equal country of the 145 nations in the report.

Greater equality isn’t just about fairness; as the report says, enlightened self-interest suggests countries should want their women to be participating more fully in society.

Inequality hurts growth. Take Japan, for example, where Prime Minister Shinzo Abe professes to have adopted the “womenomics” doctrine coined by Goldman Sachs economist Kathy Matsui as long ago as 1999. In April 2014, Japan’s labor ministry offered an inducement worth 300,000 yen ($2,400) to small- and medium-sized companies that promoted women. As of Sept. 30, not a single payment had been applied for.

Forcing fathers to leave their desks for a month or two would go a long way toward removing parenthood as an excuse for treating women as second-class employees.

Sure, there’d be an upfront cost. But the long-term benefits of reducing inequality would make it a price worth paying. •

Mark Gilbert is a Bloomberg View columnist.

No posts to display