BOSTON – A lawsuit challenging Fall River’s decision to sell land that could host a casino will continue.
On Tuesday, the Massachusetts Appeals Court denied a request by the Fall River Redevelopment Authority to dismiss the lawsuit brought by a group of taxpayers in October.
The taxpayers charge that the authority overstepped its bounds in agreeing to sell the land – once envisioned as a biopark – to the Mashpee Wampanoag tribe.
The city fired back that the taxpayers had no legal standing to sue.
In a ruling, Justice Scott L. Kafker said it was premature to dismiss the question of whether taxpayers could pursue the case. He called the record at Superior Court – where the lawsuit started – “undeveloped.” Kafker asked the judge handling the case to put together a more complete factual record.
“Resolution of the 10 taxpayers’ standing to challenge the transaction is a critical aspect of the petition before us, and the motion judge is better-positioned to develop the record and address any factual issues necessary to deciding this question,” Kafker wrote.
A lawyer for the taxpayers hailed the decision and said the city’s attempt to dismiss the suit solely on a legal question showed signs of desperation.
“They’re just trying to get it thrown out on a technicality, which obviously we’ll fight,” lawyer Lesley Rich told Providence Business News.
The case, however, may become a moot point. Legislation that would legalize casino gambling in the state appears stalled on Beacon Hill.
No posts to display
Sign in
Welcome! Log into your account
Forgot your password? Get help
Privacy Policy
Password recovery
Recover your password
A password will be e-mailed to you.