Updated February 20 at 6:25am

R.I. DOT leaves highway logo fee discussion to legislature


PROVIDENCE – After facing fierce opposition from business owners, the R.I. Department of Transportation has backed down from a plan to charge businesses whose logos appear on informational signs along the state’s highways.

The R.I. State Traffic Commission had been slated to discuss the issue earlier this week, but the DOT pulled the request. DOT spokesman Bryan Lucier said Friday that the DOT decided the General Assembly and governor were better positioned to address the issue.

“It’s really a much larger decision than simply signs,” Lucier said. “By moving it to the General Assembly it will really go through a complete, comprehensive public process.”

Last fall the DOT proposed charging businesses who added their logos after Jan. 1 a $300 fee for each sign. The annual fee would increase incrementally until reaching $1,200 annually by 2017.

At the time, the plan drew fire from then state Sen. Leonidas Raptakis, D-Coventry, who owns Venus Pizza in Coventry and has logos on information signs. In January, Raptakis met with DOT Director Michael Lewis and other agency officials to express his concerns that the fee would hurt small businesses and the state that taxes their sales.

On Thursday, Raptakis said he was pleased with the DOT’s decision to let the lawmakers and Gov. Lincoln D. Chafee tackle the topic.

“Hopefully the legislature can come out with a better proposal that will be a lot more fair to everyone,” Raptakis said.

Raptakis said he hoped lawmakers would consider pegging annual fees to gross sales.

A spokesman for Chafee said it was too early to tell whether the sign fees would find their way into the proposed budget Chafee is slated to deliver to lawmakers in early March.


2 comments on this story | Please log in to comment by clicking here
Please log in or register to add your comment

As a business owner myself, I think the only fair thing to do here is pull all the signs. I don't want the big, bad gubmint treating me like they are my nanny and will do this for me for free. If these companies want to advertise then they are best served by paying for their own advertisement rather than having my tax dollars pay for their advertisements on highways.

Friday, February 11, 2011 | Report this

As a traveler I find the signs very helpful. I did not know that if you have a sign, you must offer the public the use of a rest room. A sign is advertising, therefore there should be a cost. Keeping a clean restroom might be the proper cost. The question would be how do we assure our selfs of clean restrooms after allowing the signage.

Answers anyone?

Sunday, February 13, 2011 | Report this
Latest News