Updated February 27 at 4:27pm

Retirees objecting to pension settlement file separate lawsuit

(Updated, 5:30 p.m.) Fifty retired state employees and public school teachers have filed a lawsuit against the state of Rhode Island, objecting to their inclusion in the proposed class-action settlement of the state pension reform lawsuits. More

To continue reading this article, please do one of the following.



Sign up to receive Providence Business News' newsletters
and breaking news alerts.  

pension reform

Retirees objecting to pension settlement file separate lawsuit

Posted:

(Updated, 5:30 p.m.)

PROVIDENCE – Fifty retired state employees and public school teachers have filed a lawsuit against the state of Rhode Island, objecting to their inclusion in the proposed class-action settlement of the state pension reform lawsuits.

In the lawsuit filed by Sean T. O’Leary of O’Leary Law Associates in Warwick, the retirees claim that the settlement “purports to include individuals in the class-action suit who have had no representation or involvement in the RIPERC suit” and that their claims are not adequately represented by a class-action suit that includes all affected retirees regardless of age or date of retirement.

All 50 of the retirees named as plaintiffs in the new lawsuit filed Thursday retired before the enactment of the pension reform act in 2011.

In addition, the lawsuit alleges that the state – represented by Gov. Lincoln D. Chafee, General Treasurer Gina M. Raimondo and the Employees Retirement System of Rhode Island – effectively breached its contract with public employees by altering the benefits public workers received under the ERSRI.

Specifically, the suit cites the changes made to the cost-of-living adjustments initially provided for under the retirement system, claiming that “the State was required to and did promise all of the Plaintiffs, upon retirement, a three-percent compounded cost-of-living adjustment” and that the state did not inform the retirees before their retirement “that their respective Allowances and/or COLAs could or would ever be reduced, suspended or eliminated.”

Under the terms of the pension settlement proposed last month, retirees would receive some increased benefits compared with the 2011 law’s package, including a one-time cost-of-living adjustment of 2 percent on the first $25,000 retirement allowance, in exchange for dropping the lawsuit. Retirees would agree not to pursue their own claims relevant to the pension reform act.

The individuals who have now filed a separate lawsuit request a trial by jury seeking a declaratory judgment from the court that would rule they will not be included in the proposed class-action pension settlement at any time.

Spokeswomen for Chafee and Raimondo, Faye Zuckerman and Joy Fox, respectively, released a joint statement. “Upon initial review there appears to be no new information in this complaint compared to the previous lawsuits. We won’t be commenting on this pending litigation, and will continue to work toward completion of the process laid out in the settlement agreement which is in the interest of all parties.”

retiree, pension settlement, pension reform, Rhode Island pension reform, Lincoln D. Chafee, Gina M. Raimondo, Sean T. O’Leary, O’Leary Law Associates, ERSRI, Employees Retirement System of Rhode Island, COLA, cost of living adjustment,

Comments

1 comment on this story | Please log in to comment by clicking here
Please log in or register to add your comment
klewis

The retirement system has been using acutarys since the mid 80s as a retired state worker that has seen forced days off, layoffs, no raises because state had no money, money being diverted from being put into retirement fund they give what was promised to me and other employees because they knew about the cost down the road read story by Projo reporter Kathy Gregg their is the proof the state knew all along

It's a joke they cannot keep their promises at the expense of hard working employees

Wednesday, July 23, 2014 | Report this
Latest News