Last Update: Jan 7 @ 3:49 PM

Economic Development

Providence among ‘most miserable cities’

PBN FILE PHOTO
INCOME TAXES second in the survey only to New York City’s boosted the Providence metro area into the No. 10 spot in the first Forbes ranking of “America’s Most Miserable Cities.”

NEW YORK – Providence is No. 10 in Forbes magazine’s first ranking of “America’s Most Miserable Cities.” A new Misery Measure, developed by the magazine, was used to rank the nation’s 150 largest metropolitan areas.

The index is the sum of a community’s rankings (from 1 to 150) on each of six criteria: local unemployment, income tax rates, commute times, the number of local Superfund sites, the violent crime rate and the weather. Data came from Oregon researcher Burt Sperling and research firm Economy.com.

Detroit came in at No. 1, with a Misery Measure of 696, with high scores in violent crime (1.251 incidents per year for every 100 residents), Superfund sites and unemployment.

No. 2 was Stockton, Calif., with high scores on everything but weather contributing to its rating of 689. Next were Flint, Mich. (675); New York City (668); Philadelphia (648); Chicago (634); Los Angeles (632); Modesto, Calif. (631); Charlotte, N.C. (625); and Providence (611).

Rhode Island’s capital city fared worst in income taxes, where the 9.9-percent rate won it a rank of 149th. “Only New York City,” with a rate of 10.5 percent, “fares worse than Providence when it comes to income tax rates,” Forbes noted. “Residents are fleeing the area, with a net migration of 20,000 out of the area over the past four years.”

In other criteria, the Providence metro area was 121st for unemployment, 111st for Superfund sites, 110th for weather (but wait a minute – it’ll change), 69th for commute times and 51st for violent crime.

Forbes magazine is a weekly business journal based in New York City. To learn more about Forbes – or to read “America’s Most Miserable Cities” and view the associated slide show – visit www.forbes.com.

Comments

4 comments on this story

Posted by from SMITHFIELD, RI at 2:55 PM, 1/31/2008

Wasn't that way under Buddy's reign.

Posted by Jim from Providence, RI at 4:34 PM, 1/31/2008

thinking way back, it wasn't that way under Raymond's reign either...

Posted by STEVEN L. from TAMPA, FL at 8:42 PM, 1/31/2008

This survey is badly flawed in the name applied and in that the indicators are those that will always damage a certin type of city. While certainly the tax component is undeniable; if evn a couple of other indicators were included, Providence would have moved well off that list.

Posted by Wesli from Providence, RI at 12:39 AM, 2/2/2008

The ranking system is hardly objective, and has many built-in prejudices, such as the assumption that high taxes are always inherently bad, and therefore cause misery. The same scheme was applied to the world's nations, and found the "most miserable" nation -- in the *entire world* -- was.. France. Yes, that's right, France. Why? Because France has a staggering 51% personal tax rate, which must be very miserable indeed for all those froggies getting 100% cradle-to-grave health insurance, and living a nation where the equivalent of welfare includes such basic necessities as museum tickets. For some reason that must be impossible for Forbes to fathom, the French are not fleeing in droves.

Should it surprise anyone that an organ with a fiscal mentality bordering on raw libertarianism should find taxes more vexing than, say, dying painfully of cancer for lack of heath care because you just happen to not make enough money to afford the predatory rates of the vultures who advertise "self-insurance" on telephone poles?

And let's talk about weather, too. I personally can't stand Florida. I'm uncomfortable when it gets above 70 F outside. My mind is like a computer, functioning best when kept well chilled. I realise I'm in the minority, but my personal "misery" definitely follows a different course than Forbes' assumptions. Anyway, if you're making enough money, then weather is not likely to be a major misery factor for you. Weather is more a misery factor for people who, say, have no shelter.

Which brings me to my final point: This "misery" concept, as laid out here, seems to track more the sort of daily annoyances of the moneyed classes, rather than those with more pressing concerns such as leaking roofs and car problems that have to wait until the rent and heat are paid. So why didn't they include a factor for Starbucks per square mile, or sushi bars per capita?

I'm sorry, Forbes, colour me extremely unimpressed. I can think of at least half a dozen cities -- that I've actually lived in, not just passed through -- that I'd pass on in favour of my beloved Providence.

This is not only not meaningful information, it's practically the opposite. Something to keep in mind next time Forbes makes some remark about "creating value" or the like.

Post a comment




From the PR Newswire
Latest Local Press Releases
  • Every Monday morning on NBC 10 News Sunrise, Frank Coletta talks with PBN Editor Mark Murphy about the latest business news.
  • Hattie Bryant invites you to watch a one- to four-minute video tip each day about best business practices from the weekly television show, Small Business School.