Last Update: Nov 20 @ 12:00 AM

Public Policy

Business leaders speak against ‘Fairness Act’

PBN PHOTO / RYAN T. CONATY
THE OVERFLOW CROWD of concerned taxpayers crowds the hallway outside the basement hearing room to watch the proceedings via closed-circuit TV.
PBN PHOTO / RYAN T. CONATY
THE MEASURE’s co-authors – Tom Sgouros, left, editor of the Rhode Island Policy Reporter, and Rep. Arthur Handy, D-Cranston – testify at the House Finance hearing.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

PROVIDENCE – Rhode Island business leaders turned out in force for yesterday’s State House hearing on a bill that would hike the state’s personal income tax and expand the sales tax to more goods and services.

Proponents argued that the bill – entitled “The Economic Growth and Fairness Act of 2008” – would generate more than $340 million in new revenue, while opponents charged it would create an anti-business climate and increase the burden on taxpayers.

Both sides crowded the hearing late yesterday before the House Finance Committee, filling every seat in the Trainor Hearing Room. Most of those on hand had to be satisfied watching the proceedings via a video monitor in the hallway.

Laurie White, president of the Greater Providence Chamber of Commerce, which led the Rhode Island Chamber of Commerce Coalition in opposing the measure (READ MORE), predicted Rhode Island will “plunge into an economic death spiral” if the bill passes. “Rhode Islanders cannot afford $340 million in new taxes,” she said. “This is truly a bill in the classic definition of the word.”

But not all business people present opposed the measure. South Kingstown Realtor Jonathan Daly LaBelle argued that more money is needed for local schools, and warned further cuts in education spending will keep Rhode Island growth stagnant. “We have to make sure that towns can meet the bar, the expectations, that the state and federal governments are setting,” he said.

If passed, the bill (H-7950 and S-2668) would raise income taxes by 2.5 percent; eliminate the alternative flat tax; and introduce a 5-percent capital gains tax. The state sales tax would be cut over time from 7 percent to 5.5 percent, but would be expanded to include goods such as luxury clothes and services such as tax preparation. The bill also would give a one-time rebate of $600 for every homeowner and renter in the state.

Most of the business leaders present urged the committee to look for ways to trim state spending, rather than boost revenues.

“This bill wipes out all the gains we’ve made and would set us back years,” said Charles Francis, who heads the Rhode Island office of commercial real estate company CB Richard Ellis. “Fix the real problem – government that we cannot afford.”

John Hazen White Jr., CEO of TACO Inc., threatened to leave the state if the bill passes. He could easily move 450 TACO jobs from Cranston to another company facility, in Fall River, White said. “Pushed to a certain point where it’s no longer worthwhile for me to be here, I’m gone.”

Mary Bernard, president of the Rhode Island Society of CPAs, spoke out against expanding the sales tax. “Most of the services that would become subject to the sales tax are mom-and-pop businesses, not big companies,” she said. “It’s easy to relocate, so think twice before you push businesses over the border.”

Proponents of the measure – many of them, advocates for social service programs – countered that the state’s current tax structure puts a greater burden on the middle class than on the wealthy.

“We’ve heard some spinning in this room regarding the income tax rate,” said the Rev. Duane Clinker. “What we’re asking for is some fairness .... If you make $18,000 a year in Rhode Island, your total tax burden is 13 percent of your income. If you’re at the top in income, your total tax burden is 6 percent.”

Rep. Arthur Handy (D-Cranston), one of the bill’s sponsors, said that past cuts in state taxes have simply shifted the revenue burden to municipalities. “We have been raising taxes – property taxes,” Handy said. “When you hear talk of people moving out of our state, it’s the property taxes.”

Before the close of the hearing, several members of the Finance Committee indicated they are leaning against the bill. “I don’t see that going this route would be better for the state of Rhode Island,” said Rep. Steven Costantino, the Providence Democrat who chairs the panel.

Additional information on the R.I. General Assembly, including the House and Senate daily calendars and listings of measures introduced each day, is available at rilin.state.ri.us.

Comments

4 comments on this story

Posted by Michael from Narragansett, RI at 3:06 PM, 3/27/2008

sgouros is communist....only in a state that openly supports Chavez could this theft be proposed.....i have an idea ...cut spending.

michael G riley

narragansett

Posted by David from Providence, RI at 9:46 PM, 3/27/2008

Why shouldn't we ALL pay our fair share of income tax? How can we possibly justify paying a lower percentage of our incomes in taxes than someone at the very bottom of the income scale? Do you truly feel it's fair for us to pay a 6% income tax while the poor pay 14%? And why shouldn't we pay a sales tax on the services we use disproportionately more of - such as legal and accounting services. What's more, we would experience NO substantive impact to our quality of life should we pay our fair share, where as for most everyone else, each dollar affects one's ability to pay for food, gas, or even medicine. I don't believe we should be solely responsible for supporting an inefficient government, but how can we possibly justify NOT paying just as much as a single father working 2 minimum wage jobs who still doesn't make enough to properly cloth his children - much less buy them $150 sneakers. Come on folks, ambition is one thing, but unbridled greed, well, I'll let you finish that. Before we torpedo this bill, let's find out the facts for ourselves, not blindly believe the ideological rhetoric we've come to expect from our usual "business" information sources.

Posted by David from Providence, RI at 10:09 PM, 3/27/2008

Part 2 - Incidental, the PBN was had the most balanced story on this issue that I've seen. I applaud your effort to maintain balance in this world of divisive and sensationalistic journalism. I thirst for accurate reporting so I can form informed decisions. Yet so many seem to be afraid of anyone with a differing view. Keep up the good work, and WELL DONE!

Posted by Mike from Lincoln, RI at 3:12 PM, 3/31/2008

David needs to let us know who is his CPA is, because I would love to pay 6% income tax or even the 14% that the "poor" are paying. When I add up all my taxes (Federal, State, SS, Medicare, Real Estate, Sales Tax and all of the nickle and dime fees that this state seems so adept in collecting) my rate is more like 50%. Higher earners ay higher rates, am I correct? What am I missing here? Single parents working two minimum wage jobs with 2 children would pay little to no taxes based on the current formula. As for $150 sneakers, I do pretty well and wouldn't spend $150 on any sneakers, your problem is that you think that I should pay for the sneakers that the single father can't afford. Get your facts straight. Do you know the definition of greed? Greed; a selfish and excessive desire for more of something (as money) than is needed. This may seem like greed to you, but I need to send my 3 kids to college (so they don't need to work 2 minimum wage jobs) and I need to feed them and I need to put gas in my car to drive to my work or business. My last comment to David is that if feels that he isn't paying his "fair share", then he should take all his extra money and give to a worthwhile charity.

Post a comment




From the PR Newswire
Latest Local Press Releases
  • Every Monday morning on NBC 10 News Sunrise, Frank Coletta talks with PBN Editor Mark Murphy about the latest business news.
  • Hattie Bryant invites you to watch a one- to four-minute video tip each day about best business practices from the weekly television show, Small Business School.