Last Update: Dec 1 @ 11:35 AM

Financial Services

U.S. House defeats $700B bailout bill

BLOOMBERG NEWS / JOSHUA ROBERTS
“I’M VERY DISAPPOINTED,” said House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank, D-Mass., shown talking to reporters last week after his panel heard testimony from U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. and Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke. “The Republicans killed this,” Frank said, adding that No further vote on the bailout plan is expected today.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

WASHINGTON – The $700 billion bailout compromise announced yesterday by U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. was rejected this afternoon by the U.S. House in a 228-to-205 vote.

“The American people rejected this bailout and now Congress did likewise,” said U.S. Rep. Mike Pence, a Republican from Indiana, according to Bloomberg News.

The legislation would have given the Treasury broad authority to buy troubled assets from financial companies.

“I’m very disappointed,” House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank, D-Mass., said in a statement after the vote. “The Republicans killed this.”

No further vote on the plan was expected today, he told Bloomberg News. Democrats voted 140 to 95 in favor of the legislation, while just 65 Republicans backed the bill and 133 opposed it, Bloomberg said.

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke last week had warned of “grave threats” to the global financial system if Congress rejected the plan.

The compromise measure – the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, hammered out with input from Democratic and Republican congressional leaders – included a Republican proposal that would have allowed for congressional oversight. But critics saw the Paulson plan as too risky and too costly, while many House Republicans also opposed it on philosophical grounds.

One opposition leader, U.S. Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas, declared that the bailout might put the nation on the “slippery slope to socialism.” Even Frank, a staunch advocate of the plan, acknowledged that it is seen by many voters as “bailing out Wall Street.”

U.S. stocks – which already had begun to fall earlier today on news of Wachovia Corp.’s purchase by Citigroup Inc., in a Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)-backed deal, and the weekend rescues of three European banks, including Amsterdam-based Fortis – plunged on the news, with 23 shares falling for each one that rose on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), Bloomberg News reported.

The decline was broad-based, paring at least 2 percent from each of the 10 industries in the S&P 500, Bloomberg said.

Wachovia shares were frozen today on NYSE after falling more than 90 percent before the official open of the trading day. Many financial institutions with Rhode Island operations also were among the losers.

Sovereign Bancorp (NYSE: SOV) ended the day down $5.52, or 65.95 percent, at $2.85 per share after dipping below $2.50 earlier in the day. “We’re not aware of any specific reasons why this happened,” Ellen Molle, spokeswoman for Sovereign Bank, said of the declining price of Sovereign shares.

“We’re fundamentally sound. We’re well capitalized,” Molle told Providence Business News. Moreover, she said, additional liquidity is available to Sovereign, should it be needed: $6.2 billion from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh; $4 billion from the Federal Reserve; and $1.8 billion from other sources.

Sovereign, based in Philadelphia, has the third largest market share in Rhode Island in terms of deposits. Bank officials found no evidence of unusual withdrawals across its entire branch network today, Molle told PBN.

Citizens Financial Group parent Royal Bank of Scotland (London Stock Exchange: RBS.L; NYSE: RBS) lost ground in both the U.K. and U.S. markets losing 13 percent to 181 British pence (1.81 pounds) in London trading and $1.24, or 31.08 percent, to $2.75 per share in NYSE trading, based on unofficial reports after the close of New York trading. Bank of America Corp. (NYSE: BAC) lost $6.45, or 17.6 percent, to $30.25.

Shares in insurer MetLife Inc. (NYSE: MET) closed down $10.06, or 18.7 percent, at $43.75 per share. Webster Financial Corp. (NYSE: WBS) lost $3.27, or 12.9 percent, to $22.06. Washington Trust Bancorp. (Nasdaq: WASH) ended down $2.81, or 10.4 percent, at $24.16 per share. Rockland Trust Co. parent Independent Bank Corp. (Nasdaq: INDB) improved late in the day to close down $1.01, or 3.4 percent, at $28.97. And Bancorp Rhode Island (Nasdaq: BARI) ended down 97 cents, or 3.3 percent, at $28.54 per share.

“It’s pretty much a nightmare,” Michael Nasto, senior trader at U.S. Global Investors Inc. in San Antonio, told Bloomberg News. “This is the worst we’ve seen it since the credit mess started. Until we know exactly why they didn’t pass it, we’re going to be selling off for a while.”

The Dow Jones Industrial Average ended the day down 777.68 points, or 7 percent, at 10,365.45 points. The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index closed down 101.59 points, or 8.8 percent, at 1,111.18, in its sharpest decline since 1987, with only Campbell Soup Co. gaining ground. The Nasdaq Composite Index ended down 199.61 points, or 9.1 percent, at 1,983.73 points. And the MSCI World Index of 23 developed markets sank as much as 84.59 points, or 6.8 percent, in its steepest intraday percentage retreat since its creation in 1970.

President George W. Bush – who had personally lobbied for the bailout bill’s passage – will talk with congressional leaders “to determine the next step,” according to spokesman Tony Fratto. “There is no question the country is facing a difficult crisis that needs to be addressed,” Fratto said.

“No one is happy about the tough decisions that were made today,” said U.S. Rep. James R. “Jim” Langevin, a Rhode Island Democrat who voted for the bill. “Our economy is in dire shape and drastic action is needed. I firmly believe that we need to act soon to avoid a domino effect that could trigger major job losses and a significant period of economic downturn with negative consequences not just on Wall Street, but on every street in the country.”

Yet, Langevin added, “any proposed legislation must ensure [that] hardworking people will have access to financing for mortgages, as well as auto, student and small business loans. Just as importantly, Democrats must continue to fight to include strong protections for taxpayers, including strong oversight of the administration, caps on executive compensation and equity in companies that later become profitable. Going forward, we must ensure that our financial sector is no longer allowed to put ordinary Americans in danger by pursuing high-risk behavior with little to no oversight.”

Additional information about federal bailout plans for the financial industry is available from the Federal Reserve Board at www.FederalReserve.gov and the U.S. Treasury Department at www.treas.gov.

Comments

11 comments on this story

Posted by Michael from Narragansett, RI at 4:55 PM, 9/29/2008

The truth is the banks have been irresponsible. Politicians appear themselves to be worried about their own savings.Perhaps raising the fdic guarantees could calm the most panicked people in the country who just happen to be wealthy politicians. I refuse to send my good money after bad. We dont need 700 billion tomorrow we need banks to be open and responsible.We also need politicians to listen to constituents and stop trying to save their personal multimillion dollar accounts at Goldman Sachs or Morgan or whoever.

Michael G Riley

Posted by Wilson from Richmond, VA at 7:02 PM, 9/29/2008

Here's a youtube telling it basically how it was. And is. Thanks, Chris and Barney.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NU6fuFrdCJY

Posted by d from ishpeming, mi at 7:32 PM, 9/29/2008

OK. Barney Frank Has Been Responsible??.?oh oh I see nothing wrong with fanny or freddy???? Give Me A Break!!!

Posted by Jeff from Mesa, AZ at 8:11 PM, 9/29/2008

Perhaps, the reason for the rejection, was simply, no one actually has explained what is being done. If you are a homeowner, you pay your mortgage to your mortgage lender, they in-turn rely on Freddie Mac/Fannie Mae to back up their loan to you for your home.

If Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac do not have the funds to insurance your mortgage, your note on the mortgage can be sent to you, due in full and payable by "X" number of days, or else you will face an eviction and removal from your home.

Now when you consider how many people are homeowners, millions, and they all receive notice that their mortgage is due payable upon receipt of the billing in full, how many of you, have the funds to pay off the mortgage in it's entirety?

If this does not get back on track, then you can fear, being thrown out of your homes, because the mortgage lender will have no other option to raise funds and operate without insurances. Therefore, millions upon millions of Americans will be forced into tents/lean to's, etc.

The problem, we are facing now began when the current Democrats took over two years ago. Senator John McCain, had introduced reform laws in October 2006 because he foresaw this. Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and Hussein Obama and all the Democrats, refused to allow McCain's bill to be introduced in October 2006, therefore, creating the potential world-wide melt down we are currently facing.

I agree with so many Americans, that the Wall Street A-Holes get paid too damn much, and their Golden Parachutes, they have when they take over a company allows them to really not care, whether they fail or not. Look at the Lehman Brothers, in the final days, they transferred over $5B to the offices in England to be used as severance package money for their executives, this I believe is a criminal act, and the US needs to confiscate those funds now!

But in getting back to the bail-out, I have been through many recessions, at least one a decade, however my grandparents went through the great Depression. I saw video and read about it in the history books, I believe, firmly, that if someone does not speak English clearly enough to the American public about what we may face, it will come to pass.

I would hope, that my simple words to homeowners will give them some understanding of where they stand, as long as they have a mortgage.

However, I have not read the bill, but it had better damm well limit and cease excessive and outlandish cash pay outs to CEOs, not to mention, it had better list and state fully, that all the Congressman and Senators in DC currently be removed ASAP for the bribery they have taken since the Democrats took over two years ago, promoting change.

Change is what we will all have soon. Change in our pockets and our money will be sorely devalued beyond comprehension, all because in October 2006, Senator Harry Reid, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Hussein Obama and all the other Democrats, refused Senator McCain's bill that would of had prevent this from occurring.

They used party politics to prevent Senator McCain's bill from being introduced and presented. He had the foresight to see this coming.

To all those greedy little bastards who gave out "no-doc" loans to people who couldn't even produce pay statements, that would show their ability to pay, then may they go straight to HELL with Reid, Pelosi and Hussein Obama and all the other Democrats, who in the past two years ran this country into chaos!!!!!

Posted by emil from tampa, FL at 8:47 PM, 9/29/2008

you have to be deaf, blind and mute not to realize the people responsible for this entire mess are:

* Nancy Pelosi blocking cheap gasoline for the poor

* Barney Frank blocking reform for Fannie Mae

* Chris Dodd blocking reform of Fannie and FReddie

* Chuck Schumer for causing banks to fail and the entire Democratic party for allowing these crooks to get away with this and using Fannie Mae as their private piggy bank.

Watch the video, read about it!!!

http://digitalartpress.wordpress.com/2008/09/29/video-proof-democrat-party-warned-responsible-for-fannie-mae-freddie-mac-economic-crisis/

Posted by James from Banning, Ca at 8:51 PM, 9/29/2008

I quote the honorable representative Langevin of Rhode Island:

"Just as importantly, Democrats must continue to fight to include strong protections for taxpayers, including strong oversight of the administration, caps on executive compensation **and equity in companies that later become profitable."

** and I suppose that would be like Amtrak? The government has never, and because of it's nature, will never run a profitable anything. Government takes money from others and gives it to others. This is the most inefficient means of capital managment. The most efficient being money spent by the person who earns it for the purposes decided upon by the person who earned it.

I recommend our government keep out of the market and focus more on upholding the constitution.

If you haven't yet, EMAIL, CALL your representative and tell them NO on any "rescue" or "Bail-out" schemes. Ben Bernakady tells us that the sky will fall if this isn't passed. However, the federal reserve and it's owners (which isn't the american people as the reserve is a privatly owned entity contracted by congress to rob us blind) have the most to gain from any such scheme.

Posted by el from ashland, or at 9:45 PM, 9/29/2008

Barney wants a quick resolution. The longer it takes the less likely the media will continue to cover his lyin' arse.

In 2003 and 2005, Frank led the charge of Fannie and Freddie panderers to block legislation to clean them up. "Fannie and Freddie have no problems," said Frank. "Yes they do," said the auditors, the Administration, and Sens. Hagee, Dole and McCain.

Now that they are self-destructing, he wants to blame the Repubs. and soak the taxpayers and apparently only a few bloggers are interested in telling the truth about him. Pretty sad stuff!

Posted by anthony from johnston, ri at 11:41 PM, 9/29/2008

Hmmmm.... Reagan's tax cuts for the rich in the eighties lead to the savings and loan bailout in the early nineties. Now the Bush tax cuts for the rich leads to a larger banking bailout. Why is it that only the people who get their info from republican radio believe that it is clearly the democrats fault. There is plenty of blame to go around on both sides so lets try for a real solution for a change. Reform the indusry first, economic bailout only as a last resort!

Posted by Pat from Palm City, Fl at 8:05 AM, 9/30/2008

Let me get this straight: last week Democrats could have passed this because they had the majority in the Congress, now this week 40% of DEMOCRATS voted against the bill? How does this make this the REPUBLICANS' fault?

Barney, you need to be impeached, not rewarded with votes. You are on YouTube saying there was no problems with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. You lied.

People, if you keep putting these communists in power, like Barney Frank, Nancy Pelosi, Chris Dodd, Chuck Schumer, Maxine Waters, and God forbid Barack Hussein Obama as President, then you deserve the crash that's coming. For years, this problem has festered and oozed because of Democrats. They're the ones that ran Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into the ground.

Please stop lying. You may fool the Koolaid drinkers in the Democrat party and the moveon.org communists but you're not fooling the rest of America.

Posted by Chris from London, at 10:05 AM, 9/30/2008

Jeff from AZ said

"If Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac do not have the funds to insurance [sic] your mortgage, your note on the mortgage can be sent to you, due in full and payable by "X" number of days, or else you will face an eviction and removal from your home."

A reputable mortgage will have conditions under which they can ask you to pay in full, but almost without exception those are if you fail to make your payments. If you are making your payments on time, then they cannot legally demand you pay in full. Of course I am not a lawyer, and there are many disreputable lenders out there ...

He continues:

"If this does not get back on track, then you can fear, being thrown out of your homes, because the mortgage lender will have no other option to raise funds and operate without insurances. Therefore, millions upon millions of Americans will be forced into tents/lean to's, etc."

Throwing you out of your house raises zero funds for them, though it does give them a small amount of equity ... it is much more likely that they would be prepared to take ownership and rent it back to the current occupiers, perhaps in a "rent to buy" scheme as it gives the banks the equity, but it also gives them income and a customer base.

In the UK there has a been a large rise in the "buy for cash and rent back" market, at least there was until the credit crunch stopped those sharks having access to cheap borrowing to buy the properties in the first place. Buying at 75% of "sticker price" and renting back at double the local rental rate allows people to remain in their homes and to use the equity they have built up to pay exorbitant rent until they can buy it back (assuming the economy picks up). But it is still unpleasant.

Posted by Carol from San Marino, CA at 10:54 PM, 9/30/2008

My guess is that the politicians can be bribed. And, so the banks stepped up and increased their payments to these legislators. While Americans SEETH.

Bush is the most unpopular president, and the worst one we've ever had!

The one thing that puzzles me is why did McCain jump up at the White House meeting last Thursday? If he wants to lose this race he could have just stayed seated. Instead, he bolted. As if the president of the United States wasn't even in charge of the meeting!

My republican representative is David Dreir. He voted YES! Then I noticed ALL of the Azizona HOUSE members voted NO. (Democrats as well as republicans.)

Is it possible McCain is the Manchurian Candidate, after all? Is it possible he picked Palin because he thought she'd be divisive? ANd, then he got surprised at the outpouring of republican support?

Are we being played like fiddles?

$630-Billion has already been extened to the FDIC.

The "only thing" the bankers want is American taxpayers to OVER-PAY for the TOXIC MORTGAGES! Oh, and on Wednesday, this new bailout scheme? It's called the DODD AMENDMENT. Bonny & Clyde were innocents in comparison to these buzzards.

Oh, and if Palin hits a home run on Thursday? What about the rumor that Biden drops out of the veep slot, and Hillary comes in?

Post a comment




From the PR Newswire
Latest Local Press Releases
  • Every Monday morning on NBC 10 News Sunrise, Frank Coletta talks with PBN Editor Mark Murphy about the latest business news.
  • Hattie Bryant invites you to watch a one- to four-minute video tip each day about best business practices from the weekly television show, Small Business School.